[FOM] Formalisation vs Foundation
Jon Awbrey
jawbrey at att.net
Fri Jul 6 08:20:15 EDT 2012
Re: Gergely Buday
At: http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2012-July/016545.html
Gergely,
C.S. Peirce took an interesting stand on the foundational status of mathematics,
taking it together with phenomenology as the most basic sciences, and making logic,
as a normative science, depend on them.
| Normative science rests largely on phenomenology and on mathematics;
| metaphysics on phenomenology and on normative science.
|
| Charles Sanders Peirce, ''Collected Papers'', CP 1.186 (1903)
The dependency relations among the sciences can be graphed as follows:
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
| |
| Metaphysics o |
| |\ |
| | \ |
| | \ |
| | o Normative Science |
| | / \ |
| | / \ |
| |/ \ |
| Phenomenology o o Mathematics |
| |
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
NB. If this ascii figure doesn't work in your browser, here is a recent
blog post where I refer to it:
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/05/31/definition-and-determination-4/
Regards,
Jon
More information about the FOM
mailing list