[FOM] 461: Reflections on Vienna Meeting

[Andre.Rodin at ens.fr]

In my sense this is the most clear and sober and also original story about the
issue that I ever heard; it alone worths the whole series of meetings on the
same topic that I helped to organaze last Spring in Paris.
Andrei



Selon Joe Shipman <JoeShipman at aol.com>:

> That Voevodsky lecture was embarrassingly ignorant. Even Fields Medalists can
> be idiots outside their area of mathematical expertise.
>
> --JS
>
>
> On May 15, 2011, at 11:08 AM, jkennedy at mappi.helsinki.fi (by way of Martin
> Davis <martin at eipye.com>) wrote:
>
> > Harvey,
> >
> > Re FOM 461, what ever happened to that nice attitude in mathematics:
> > Chacun a son gout?
> >
> > Anyway, since you mention Voevodsky, fom readers might be interested
> > in his lecture
> > called "What if Current Foundations of Mathematics are Inconsistent?"
> > given at the
> > Institute for Advanced Study September 2010.
> >
> > video.ias.edu/voevodsky-80th
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Juliette
> >
> >
> > --
> > Department of Mathematics and Statistics
> > P.O. Box 68 (Gustaf HГѓВ¤llstrГѓВ¶min katu 2b)
> > FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
> > tel. (+358-9)-191-51446, fax (+358-9)-191-51400
> > http://www.helsinki.fi/science/logic
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FOM mailing list
> > FOM at cs.nyu.edu
> > http://www.cs.nyu.edu/mailman/listinfo/fom
>
> _______________________________________________
> FOM mailing list
> FOM at cs.nyu.edu
> http://www.cs.nyu.edu/mailman/listinfo/fom
>