[FOM] Proof assistants and conjectures
Steven Ericsson-Zenith
steven at semeiosis.org
Wed Jan 7 19:08:21 EST 2009
On Jan 7, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Timothy Y. Chow wrote:
> It's clear from some of the responses that my question was not
> understood
> by everyone, so let me try again:
>
> I wrote:
>>> For the most popular proof assistants, has there has been any
>>> systematic effort to compile databases of conjectures as well as of
>>> theorems?
>
> The following emphasis may help people parse my question.
>
> Has there been any systematic effort to compile databases of
> *CONJECTURES*?
I'm afraid that this does not help much, since generally the basis of
conjecture is not itself uniform. To suggest a uniform basis to
conjecture is to either make concrete the status quo or anticipate all
future work.
Perhaps you mean simply to limit the scope of these conjectures to
specified formal systems in the most popular proof assistants. I could
have been misled by your desire to "prevent different pioneers from
developing overly idiosyncratic dialects." But if this is the case,
then your database seems unlikely to serve the true pioneer.
Sincerely,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science & Engineering
http://iase.info
http://senses.info
More information about the FOM
mailing list