[FOM] The empty set
Stephen Pollard
spollard at truman.edu
Wed Feb 28 09:30:35 EST 2007
Robbie Lindauer wrote:
> The existence of the empty set is not a logical truth either.
I'm inclined to agree, but here's something to consider. It would not
be crazy to insist that one direction of the Comprehension scheme is
a conceptual truth governing our use of class abstracts and epsilon.
I have in mind:
If x belongs to {x: Fx}, then Fx.
It follows that nothing belongs to {x: not x=x}. Conclusion: it is
conceptually true that something has no members
Stephen Pollard
Professor of Philosophy
Division of Social Science
Truman State University
spollard at truman.edu
More information about the FOM
mailing list