February 2003 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Feb 1 06:16:35 EDT 2003
Ending: Fri Feb 28 08:44:17 EDT 2003
Messages: 100

• [FOM] 3 postings from Alexander Zenkin   by way of Martin Davis <martin at eipye.com>
• [FOM] 3 postings from Alexander Zenkin   Peter Apostoli
• [FOM] Understanding universal quantification   Peter Apostoli
• [FOM] Understanding universal quantification   Peter Apostoli
• [FOM] Quantification and identity   Peter Apostoli
• [FOM] Quantification and identity (re: P. Apostoli)   Peter Apostoli
• [FOM] Cantor's argument   Andrej Bauer
• [FOM] CCA 2003 - Second Announcement and Call for Papers   Vasco Brattka
• [FOM] Cantor's argument   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] FOM: Infinite sets and plural reference   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] FOM: Set Theory for Crocodiles   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] FOM: Nino Cochiarella paper   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Follow-up to Tennant   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Follow-up to Tennant   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Understanding universal quantification   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Quantification and Identity   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Recursive but not p.r. computable functions -- the simplest "natural" examples???   Jeremy Clark
• [FOM] book announcement   S B Cooper
• [FOM] Conference on Non-Classical Logics in Tbilisi   Martin Davis
• [FOM] FROM THE FOM MODERATOR: getting your email address right   Martin Davis
• [FOM] Recursive but not p.r. computable functions -- the simplest "natural" examples???   H. Enderton
• [FOM] Cantor Theorem   Ross A. Finlayson
• [FOM] Follow-up to Tennant   Ross A. Finlayson
• [FOM] Re:Clarification on Higher Set Theory   Thomas Forster
• [FOM] Clarification on Higher Set Theory   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Clarification on Higher Set Theory   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Re:Clarification on Higher Set Theory   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Question about hard-core independence   Haim Gaifman
• [FOM] Question about hard-core independence   Haim Gaifman
• [FOM] Re: Understanding universal quantification   John Goodrick
• [FOM] re: synonymity   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] FoM: Recursive but not p.r. computable functions   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] Understanding Universal Quantification   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] Quantification and identity (re: P. Apostoli)   A.P. Hazen
• [FoM] Slater on epsilon terms and domains   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] Recursive but not p.r. computable functions   Jeff Hirst
• [FOM] Axioms of denotation with Simmons' paradox   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Simmons' denotation paradox and non-attributive reference   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Simmons paradox with a formal Denotes relation   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Simmons' denotation paradoxes   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Simmons' denotation paradoxes   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Languages with their own Denotation relation   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Simmons' denotation paradoxes   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Cantor Theorem   Matt Insall
• [FOM] Cantor's Theorem   Matt Insall
• [FOM] New Book: Doing Mathematics: Convention, Subject, Calculation, Analogy   Martin Krieger
• [FOM] Re: Recursive but not p.r. computable functions   Hilly Levitz
• [FOM] Intensionality   Joao Marcos
• [FOM] Modal logics of contingency   Joao Marcos
• [FOM] re:3rd edition of Jech's "Set Theory" book   Dave Marker
• [FOM] Quantification and identity   Matthew McKeon
• [FOM] Understanding universal quantification   Chris Menzel
• [FOM] Understanding universal quantification   Steve Newberry
• [FOM] Cantor's argument   Giuseppina Ronzitti
• [FOM] Cantor's argument   Giuseppina Ronzitti
• [FOM] Cantor's argument   Giuseppina Ronzitti
• [FOM] FOM Cantor's argument   Giuseppina Ronzitti
• [FOM] Understanding universal quantification   Giuseppina Ronzitti
• [FOM] Understanding universal quantification   Giuseppina Ronzitti
• [FOM] None [Arithmetic with the biggest number]]   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] Hodges' and Simmons' paradoxes   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Simmons' denotation paradoxes   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Simmons' denotation paradoxes   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Simmons' denotation paradoxes   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Understanding Universal Quantification   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Simmons' denotation paradoxes   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Recursive but not p.r. computable functions -- the simplest "natural" examples???   Peter Smith
• [FOM] 3 postings from Alexander Zenkin   Robert M. Solovay
• [FOM] Question about hard-core independence   John Steel
• [FOM] A question concerning continuous functions   Steve Stevenson
• [FOM] Cantor's argument   William Tait
• [FOM] FOM Cantor's argument   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] FOM Cantor's argument   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] REFORMATTED Correction to my "Cantor'd argument" post REFORMATTED   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] FOM: Infinite sets and plural reference   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] Cantor's Theorem   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] FOM Cantor's argument   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] Follow-up to Tennant   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] Understanding universal quantification   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] Synonymity   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] Recursive but not p.r. computable functions   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] None   Robert Williams
• [FOM] Cantor's argument   Alexander Zenkin
• [FOM] Cantor's argument   Alexander Zenkin
• [FOM] cycles in Boolean Networks   abuchan at mail.unomaha.edu
• [FOM] Conferenece_Announcement   japaridze g
• [FOM] 3rd edition of Jech's "Set Theory" book   joeshipman at aol.com
• [FOM] Predicative Powerset Construction   steve newberry
• [FOM] Reply to Neil Tennant   steve newberry
• [FOM] FOM Cantor's argument   steve newberry
• [FOM] synonymity   praatika at mappi.helsinki.fi
• [FOM] Recursive but not p.r. computable functions -- the simplest "natural" examples???   praatika at mappi.helsinki.fi
• [FOM] Synonymity   praatika at mappi.helsinki.fi
• [FOM] 3 postings from Alexander Zenkin   sandylemberg at juno.com
• [FOM] Clarification on Higher Set Theory   sean.stidd at juno.com
• [FOM] Clarification on Higher Set Theory   sean.stidd at juno.com
• [FOM] None   stevnewb at ix.netcom.com
• [FOM] REFORMATTED Correction to my "Cantor'd argument" post REFORMATTED   stevnewb at ix.netcom.com
• [FOM] Re:Clarification on Higher Set Theory   wm at cage.rug.ac.be
• [FOM] Re:Clarification on Higher Set Theory   wm at cage.rug.ac.be

Last message date: Fri Feb 28 08:44:17 EDT 2003
Archived on: Fri Mar 11 12:49:57 EDT 2005

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...