Obviously, I\Sigma_1 + Con(I\Sigma_1) is a sub-theory of I\Sigma_2,
since I\Sigma_2 proves Con(I\Sigma_1). I am guessing (a) that it is a
proper sub-theory and (b) that it does not even interpret I\Sigma_2.
Yes? References?
Does the same hold for I\Sigma_n + Con(I\Sigma_{n+k})?
Thanks in advance,
Richard Heck